The Second World War is easily one of the top 2 or 3 film settings in the history of film. We've seen WW2 done in just about every conceivable way.. and it's easy to see why. The scale of the war is virtually inconceivable to a modern audience, and the clear morality of the conflict makes it easy to tell re-envisioned or adapted versions of virtually any myth or archetypical heroic story by using the war as a backdrop.
David Ayer, the writer/director of Fury, cut his teeth on gritty LA crime dramas. He wrote Training Day, wrote the first Fast and Furious film, wrote and directed the underrated Harsh Times, and wrote and directed End of Watch, here we see a departure (although he did write U-571) with a World War 2 tank film. Ayer's films are violent, often brutal, and hyper-masculine, so it's exciting to see his take on a well-worn genre. Ayer has also been tapped to write and direct WB/DC's Suicide Squad, kind of a superhero twist on The Dirty Dozen, and I think that's kind of an inspired choice.
Here, we are dropped into Germany in April, 1945. The war is nearly over (indeed, it will end on May 8, although our characters don't know that) and our war-weary characters have fought their way into Germany itself. As they face increasingly desperate German defense in hostile territory, the seasoned tank unit is forced to accept a raw recruit due to personnel shortages. This recruit, Norman, (Logan Lerman) has zero training or experience, which is a bit of an issue for the rest of the crew, who have been together for years. The crew, led by "Wardaddy" (Brad Pitt, in a bleak take on his Aldo Raine character from Inglorious Basterds) finds itself tasked with defending an important crossroads at the main column's rear, and desperately trying to survive the war.
The Good: first, I don't think I've ever quite seen WW2 depicted in this way. It's become commonplace in our culture, already inclined to think of veterans in a positive light, to treat every member of the "greatest generation" in a venerated air of hushed respect. That's simplistic, morally simplistic, and quite frankly disrespectful to the millions of unique individuals who served during this time representing all shades of the human condition. This film treats its characters as flawed, dark, cynical but most of all believable human beings. They aren't trying to be heroes. They're guys who've seen a lot of horrible shit and just want to do their job and go home. The film is gritty, dark, and dirty, with everyone constantly covered in filth, mud, grease and blood, the way I imagine a tank crew in enemy territory in 1945 would have been. The action sequences are tremendously and impressively choreographed, and the film features the single finest tank battle I've ever seen depicted on screen. The narrative is tight, despite the long runtime, and it's not overly grand in scope, choosing to focus on "man on the ground" realism rather than large displays. But most of all, the highlight of this film are the performances, and two in particular. Brad Pitt is, at this point, maybe the most quietly assured movie star on the planet. He eases into his roles with aplomb and brings a truly remarkable depth and humanity to a damaged yet charismatic man who easily could have become a caricature. It's become commonplace to rip on Shia LaBeouf, and the guy is no-doubt a weirdo, but in this film he turns in a legitimately great performance as "bible", the tank's gunner and spiritual leader. He's nearly unrecognizable, missing teeth, scarred, mustached and covered in mud while mumbling most of his lines, but his character feels so incredibly true to life and delivers some of the film's most powerful moments. See below. Jon Berenthal (Shane from the Walking Dead) and Michael Pena are strong as well and Logan Lerman grows up before our very eyes on screen. The combat depicted is brutal, and the gallows humor between the men galling, and in a lot of ways this film feels like a war horror movie - which I suppose is what a good depiction of war should be. The violence and gore is occasionally shocking, but I suppose it probably is pretty shocking to see the things one sees in war. By the time of the film's climatic battle, we have spent so much time with these men so intimately, that we are incredibly invested in every shot... and the battle is infinitely better for it.
The Bad: if anything, it may be TOO gory, which could lead to a legitimate criticism of the film taking relish in its disturbing visuals. I don't think that's what the film is trying to do, but there are some horror-gore level visuals that can be a little upsetting. Additionally, I liked what Logan Lerman was doing by and large, but I don't think his character was interesting or compelling enough to match what Brad Pitt and Shia LaBeouf were up to. Granted, he's an audience cipher and our window into this world, but he's just not that interesting. Additionally, I think it's worth stating that I feel the film ultimately falls a little short of its goal.... there are occasional moments of true... grace? Beauty? And profound humanity.. but at its heart it falls short of greatness, and settles for "damn fine war movie"... which isn't so bad.
Ultimately, this is a poignant, powerful, occasionally upsetting and visually thrilling film. Fans of World War 2 or war movies in any way should not miss this one, as I feel that it's a valuable addition to the war canon. Don't come to see gallant heroes vanquish evil. Come to see human beings cope with hell on earth. And for a few really great actors do some really great work.
8/10.
Showing posts with label Shia LaBeouf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shia LaBeouf. Show all posts
Friday, December 5, 2014
Monday, September 24, 2012
2012: The Year in Film: "Lawless" Review
Ugh. I'm the worst, you guys. I saw this one weeks ago and just never got around to reviewing it. My apologies, football season + work and so on has just left me in a perpetual state of sleep deprivation and unable to muster the energy to review crazy person arthouse flicks like I've got in the hopper. But let's do it, shall we? We're headed into fall, and with it, Oscar bait, so my movie seeing schedule will likely pick way up and I'd like to be on top of it when I see say, "The Master". (can't wait...) So let's see about "Lawless", shall we?
Author/musician/screenwriter/crazy person Nick Cave and director John Hillcoat collaborated on 2005's "The Proposition", which is brutal and pretty much great, so I was excited about this one from first trailer on. First, sometimes the marketing does a flick absolutely no favors. From watching the trailer and seeing the posters you'd think that this is a bang-bang shoot 'em up featuring hero bootleggers against a corrupt system. And while it's KIND OF that, it's mostly approximately 15 other things. This is no "Goodfellas" or grand crime drama, it's an arthouse flick infinitely more concerned with showing and ruminating than with its narrative or symbolism. This is a time and a place that echoes today perhaps louder than ever before.. and through the lens of these larger-than-life people we can perhaps glean a thing or two about humanity... isn't that the greater purpose of art, after all?
It is the early 1930s in Franklin County, Virginia, in the midst of the Great Depression and Prohibition. Franklin County, deep in the backwoods of western Virginia, was at one time referred to as "the wettest county in the world" due to the prevalence of bootlegged moonshine and illegal moonshine stills. Based on a book by the grandson and great-nephew of the main characters, the flick focuses on the three Bondurant brothers, Jack, Forrest and Howard, notable and feared local characters and prolific bootleggers. The Bondurant brothers, violent, stubborn, oddly principled and fiercely loyal, find themselves pitted against corrupt law enforcement as Franklin County becomes a gangland war zone.
The good: this flick looks and sounds great. The sets, costumes, shots and sounds are all extremely artfully done, and blow away a lot of what you'll find in films with blockbuster-sized budgets. This cast is extremely talented, with Tom Hardy and Jessica Chastain especially doing simply amazing work. Hardy may well be the most talented actor under 40 working today, and it will be a damn shame if he doesn't walk away with at least an Oscar nom from this one. His Forrest Bondurant is a dynamo... simply owning scenes and creating a nuanced and layered character out of whole cloth. Jason Clarke is underrated and under used and is always, always good. Guy Pearce and Gary Oldman in supporting roles? Hot. In addition, the flick treats its subject matter with respect and dilligence, the rural feel comes off as extremely authentic and gritty, and it doesn't shirk from the brutal violance associated with crime. There's something beautiful and insane about the fact that it takes two Australians to make the most authentic modern depiction of depression-era 20th century rural America I've seen on film.
The bad: Shia LaBeouf is simply out of his league here. The role isn't especially flattering and is quite difficult, as a young, foolhardy, brash younger brother comes of age and searches for love, but Tom Hardy has more talent in one of his grunts than Shia has in his entire coked-out body. It's not entirely Shia's fault... I'm not sure who honestly could have held a candle to Hardy in this one... Gosling, maybe? But Shia is definitely outshined and out done and comes off as a weak-link. Considering he's the main character, that's bad. In addition, just what the shit is going on with Guy Pearce? I get that he's supposed to be a strange outsider... but how would he rise to his position being THAT strange? It strains credibility. The plot is occasionally un-focused and tends to meander without seeming focus or aim. I understand that it's not a plot-driven film, but at the same time some people (cough, Gary Oldman, cough) are simply criminally under-used while some seemingly unimportant parts and scenes are given too much play. I don't know if that's an editing issue, a directing issue or a script issue, but it knocks something that could have been a classic down a couple of notches.
In the end, this is a violent, sincere depiction of a fascinating group of people and a story well worth telling. Come for the beautiful shots and Tom Hardy alone. Well worth a watch, but unfortunately just a few notches short of true greatness.
7.5/10.
Labels:
Jessica Chastain,
Lawless,
Movie Reviews,
Nick Cave,
Shia LaBeouf,
Tom Hardy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
