Showing posts with label Justin Timberlake. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justin Timberlake. Show all posts

Monday, May 19, 2014

2013: The Year in Film: "Inside Llewyn Davis" Review

Note: WAY late, guys. But I'm going to make an honest effort to review every film I've seen as of late, AND I'd like to get current over the next month or so. So yes, this film and a number of films I'll be reviewing over the next few weeks are already out on DVD, but I'd like to review them nonetheless. Additionally, as I saw this film in 2013, it will continue to bear the "2013" title, as will the other films I embarrassingly saw in 2013 and have yet to review in May, 2014. So bear with me.

If you put together a list of best/most important modern American directors, the Coen Brothers are pretty damn close to the top of that list.  Their films have run the gamut from absurdist comedy to violent crime caper, and any pair of filmmakers who could count works as diverse as "No Country For Old Men", "The Big Lebowski", "Raising Arizona", "Fargo" and "O Brother Where Art Thou" are surely people to keep your eye on. Their last film, an update on the John Wayne classic "True Grit" featuring a nearly unrecognizable Jeff Bridges in the John Wayne role was a tour de force and one of the more underrated and under appreciated films of the last 5 years or so. (It got subsumed in "King's Speech" madness) However, despite their obvious brilliance, the Coen's have never been filmmakers to subject themselves to industry or audience expectations, and are just as happy to make a mad cap comedy (say, "Burn After Reading") or understated character study/biblical allegory ("A Serious Man") as they are to make the type of serious drama that traditionally dominates awards season.

Enter: "Inside Llewyn Davis", a film that centers on the New York City folk music scene of the early 1960's, and the titular Llewyn Davis, a talented but ornery struggling musician barely eking out a meager living and relying on the generosity of friends as he tries to find success and deals with the recent loss of his songwriting partner.

The Good: Rarely, if ever, have a seen a more true to life depiction of the tortured artistic soul that seems just as likely to create depressed melancholy as it does genius. This isn't an uplifting or inspiring tale of success against unlikely odds or a rise to stardom, it's a portrait of a person, a time, and a place that's important mainly for its very ordinariness. Oscar Isaac's (to this point, a rather minor actor with a career full of supporting performances - but a lead role in the new Star Wars film and this one could signal a coming breakout) performance is, in a word, stunning. The understated charm, musical chops, and sarcastic bitterness masking as humor is the kind of quiet, muted performance that is unlikely (and didn't!) to gain attention from the academy, but it's exactly this kind of performance that makes a film timeless. There are Llewn Davis' playing drop in gigs and open mics in every city in the country, and their trail of bitterness and failure is infinitely more likely to be the outcome than is stardom.  The rest of the cast is solid as well, with Justin Timberlake (who's actually a pretty good actor, you guys) and the always solid Carey Mulligan standing out, with Coen staple John Goodman contributing a memorable and bombastic extended cameo as well. Visually, the film is stunning and a bit disarming, choosing a muted palate of drab colors and dull lighting to give the film a cold and smoky feel that seems to complement the understated folk soundtrack perfectly. Of course, this being a Coen bros. film, there's the trademark dark and absurdist humor that plays out both situationally and via dialogue. When it wants to be, this is a very funny film.


The Bad: if anything, this film is TOO muted and TOO slow for its own good. It's like a lazy winter Sunday encapsulated into film. Not that there's anything necessarily wrong with that, but it explains why the film escaped the notice of many when it came time for year-end accolades. While I ultimately was a fan of the narrative (or lack thereof), I can see why the film had its detractors.

Ultimately, if you're a Coen bros. fan, a musician, someone who knows or is interested in either musicians or folk music, or a fan of muted and occasionally very funny character pieces, you could do much, much worse than checking out the Coens' latest, one of the more underappreciated films of 2013.

8.5/10.

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

2011: The Year in Film: "In Time" Review

In Time When done properly, Science Fiction can be a powerful tool with which to comment on the real world. When done through allegory and the symbolism of a simplified and more extreme world, fantastical fiction can paint injustice and happenstance in our own world in a clarified and glaring light. The sci fi subgenre of the dystopian world does this as well as any. In the tradition of Orwell's 1984, a glimpse of a nightmarish future can comment on current affairs better than the vast majority of more "realistic" fiction. Writer/director Andrew Niccol is no stranger to this tradition, having made the very underrated "Gattaca" (check it out if you haven't seen it) and also written "The Truman Show". Into this tradition steps "In Time", a film that seeks to comment on discrepancies in wealth, society's obsession with youth and humanity's obsession with immortality through the lens of a dystopian future.

So how is it, right? Well, first, the concept is a great one. In the near future (they never say exactly when, but clearly this has been going on for a while), through genetic engineering, everyone lives to 25, and from that point gets 1 year to live. "Time" has replaced money as the currency of choice, and while rich people live more or less forever, the poor scrap for minutes and hours, often dying extremely young. The population is separated into "zones" that are distinguished by their relative wealth or poverty, only of course, "wealth" is actually time. Good guy Will (Timberlake) who slaves away in a dead end job just to make it from day-to-day has a chance encounter with a drunken rich man who's decided he wants out, and chances onto a whole lot of extra "time". This catches the attention of the "time police" who are out to make sure that the system stays stable and time stays in the right hands. Will decides to take matters into his own hands and challenge the system, butting up against some very powerful people.



The concept allows for the cast to all be young and beautiful. Since no one ages past 25, all adults look exactly the same age, whether they're 28 or 105. As a result, the cast is all more or less the same age, and this results in some interesting interactions. The cast is solid, featuring lots of young, pretty people, and the film is very sleek and stylized, with everything shaped in some sort of neo classical high tech retro vibe. (If that makes sense) The settings and concepts and designs are reminiscent of other dystopian works, from Equilibrium and The Hunger Games series to 1984.

Timberlake can actually carry a flick, which I wasn't sure about, so good for him. He's strong but not great in the lead role, which is more or less your typical action hero role, strong guy of few words but heart of gold kind of thing. Olivia Wilde plays Timberlake's mother and is strong in her limited role. Cillian Murphy plays the "time keeper" who becomes obsessed with bringing fugitive Will to justice. Amanda Seyfried plays a wealthy heiress/hostage turned comrade in arms and Vincent (Pete from Mad Men) Kartheiser plays a wealthy magnate and Seyfried's father. Murphy is a highlight, for sure, and really jumps into his role with a lot of enthusiasm.

This film is good, but only good. The acting is solid, and I love the premise, but after a strong start it sort of devolves into your standard action flick. Maybe I'm doing the flick a disservice by expecting more than an action chase flick, but coming from the strong tradition of science fiction social commentary, I was hoping for less screeching tires and more thoughtful observation. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it would have been fun to see them do more with the premise. In addition, some of the characters could have used some more characterization and at a certain point the allegory simply became too heavy handed. I enjoyed it, had a good time, and it certainly looks great, including all the pretty people, but it could have been much more.

Good (and certainly a lot of fun), but not great. 6.8/10.